Company Changes Over Time And It Is Easy For A Business Plan

A company changes over time and it is easy for a business plan to become out-of-date. In this case, you must amend your business plan. You must make the necessary alterations so that the new plan takes into account the new variables and addresses them to keep the business on track. Keep in mind, that you cannot see the future, so building a perfect business plan at the beginning is practically impossible. Don’t get frustrated when some things do not go as planned. Instead, alter your plan to take into account the changes. Daniel C. Finley, a former advisor and president of a business development consulting and coaching service agrees that your business plan must evolve over time, however he cautions you not to â€Å"over-adjust it.† He writes,†¦show more content†¦Goals allow you to gage the progress of your business. It prevents anyone from getting overwhelmed. It shows them how much they have accomplished rather than how much there is left to do. This leads t o a more positive work environment and increased employee happiness. An important aspect to the success of a business, that often goes unnoticed, is the happiness of its employees. If an employee is miserable doing the work they are given, then the willingness of this employee to go the extra mile for the sake of the company is extremely limited. The employees who are miserable with what they do for a living are the ones who care solely about the paycheck at the end of the week rather than the result of their work and its impact on the business. Employees should be happy in the workplace. It should be filled with positive energy because when an employee is positive and motivated, they tend to be more productive. Daniel Sgroi, in the Journal of Labor Economics, writes: In three different styles of experiment, randomly selected individuals are made happier either through the use of a short (10 minute) comedy clip or through the provision of drinks and snacks. We check that these methods make the subjects happier (they do) and then go on to show that these individuals have approximately 12% greater productivity than a control group. (Finley, Daniel C)

The Definition Of Science And Research Methods - 1189 Words

What is science? A brief elaboration of the definition of science and research methods INTRODUCTION Science is a complex activity, which may be defined in a number of ways. To unite both the process and the product of science, one way to define science is as a process of constructing predictive conceptual models (Gilbert, 1991). Gilbert (1991) states, when referring to Kuhn (1970, Lunetta Hofstein (1981), Miller (1978) and Stevens Collins (1980) that in essence, ‘’the definition of science includes virtually all of the products of science, is consistent with the expanded definition of models evident in the literature and unifies scientific fields which operate with diverse methodologies.’’ (p.73). With this statement, Gilbert†¦show more content†¦QUANTITATIVE VS. QUALITIVE RESEARCH The Oxford Dictionary defines research ‘’as a careful study of a subject, especially in order to discover new facts or information about it [..]’’. Research can be divided into qualitative and quantitative research. Many authors have elaborated about the qualitative-quantitative debate. Some different than the other, but not a lot of authors seem to prefer one method above the other. Many new articles come up promoting mix-method research where both methods are used simultaneously. Like many other authors, Hennink, Hutter Bailey (2011) elaborate in their book about the key differences between qualitative and quantitative research. This paper is based on, but not limited to, their findings. A characteristic of quantitative research is that it is based on positivism (Sale et al., 2002) in contrast to qualitative research that is based on interpretivism (Altheide Johnson, 1994; Kuzel Like, 1991; Secker et al., 1995) and constructivism (Guba Lincoln, 1994), which is a very clarifying explanation for the two terms. Quantitative research methods are based on one truth and leave no room for own interpretation, while qualitative research leave room for multiple realities and are open for interpretation (Sale et al., 2002). When doing a qualitative analysis you interpreted your data, oppose to doing a quantitative analysis, which is statistical. Regarding the

Radicalization French Revolution Free Essays

Reasons radicalization of French Revolution By the end of September 1791, the National Assembly announced that its work was done. In many ways, the Constitution of 1791 seemed to fulfil the promises of reform which had been first uttered by the men of 1789. All Frenchmen could now be proud that the following rights had been secured: equality before the law, careers open to talent, a written constitution, and parliamentary government. We will write a custom essay sample on Radicalization French Revolution or any similar topic only for you Order Now Hence, there was a sizeable faction within the National Assembly who were satisfied and claimed the Revolution to be at an end as its primary aims had been achieved. However, by 1792 the revolution moved in a more radical and violent direction. Why the revolution became radical is often debated, and there are essentially two main reasons as to why it did so. First, a counter-revolution, loyal to Church and King, was led by the noble and the clergy and supported by staunch Catholic peasants. This threatened the changes of the revolutionaries; therefore they turned to drastic measures. Second, the economic, social, and political discontent of the urban working classes also propelled the Revolution in the direction of radicalism. These were the small shop-keepers, artisans and wage earners, referred to as ‘sans-culottes’. Popular discontent and Jacobin agitation was evident in August as the city council was overthrown and the Commune of Paris was established. Despite the revolutionaries drafting a constitution, they now had no monarch as the royal family was under house arrest. By September the capital was in a state of chaos as more than 1,200 people were killed. This took place in order to maintain revolution and keep it moving forward. Although the constitution was already enshrined and the citizens had their freedom and liberties, there was still plenty of public dissent and disapproval as to whether or not these laws would help create a new government and prevent the country from breaking apart. The people had come this far and were not prepared to watch their efforts lead to failure or the restoration of an absolute monarchy. As a result of this radical forces were able to get citizens on side by claiming the constitution of 1791 did not meet the demands of all the people. Radicals led the Commune, discarded the old constitution and called for a National Convention to revise a new one. In January 1793, Louis XVI was executed and the Jacobins condemned their actions by claiming that the monarchy had to be abolished in order to eliminate as many of the royalist and monarchists that remained. France was declared a republic and it could be suggested that his death signified the emergence of nationalism as people remained loyal to the radicals. In addition to this, it highlighted the point where radicalism would dominate the revolution. The revolution faced strain as it coped with the weight of foreign war and civil war which caused the revolutionary leadership to grow more radical. Moderate reformers – the Girondins, had previously dominated the National Convention, but this was to change. Division within the convention began to emerge within the Convention as the Jacobins and Girondins desired different aims. Factional disputes resulted in the replacement of the Girondins with the Jacobins – the far more radical of the two. The Jacobins claimed it was their duty to save the revolution and their strengths helped gain them the support of the sans-culottes. It was the premise of the Jacobins that they should eradicate the â€Å"enemies† and secure the destiny of the revolution through the destruction of counter-revolutionary forces. The Jacobins managed to grip firm control of the Convention and the French Nation. Essentially, they were now the government. However, with the strain of civil war, economic distress and threats of foreign invasion, they realised strong leadership was required in order to save the revolution. The CPS assumed tight leadership in April 1793, and it has been argued that the reign of terror followed from this. The Committee ordered arrests and trials of counter-revolutionaries and imposed government authority. However, there was no turning back from the radical phase that the people had voluntarily entered. By summer, the reign of terror had spread over France, spearheaded by the infallibility of Robespierre, began persecuting even the innocent. It can be seen it was far too radical as even the moderate Girondins were accused of counter-revolutionary actions and expelled from the Convention. What was once a legislative, two-sided body had now become an authoritarian oligarchy led by radicals. It has been argued that this was a step backwards in the revolution as it imitated an absolute monarchy, without the safeguards of constitution. Around 17,000 people died as a result of the terror, and this was to be a stage in the revolution that could not be undone. In the summer of 1794 there seemed to be less need for terror and the republic seemed a reality. With the 9th Thermidor, the machinery of the Jacobin republic was dismantled. Leadership passed to the property owning bourgeoisie. The government then changed hands to the five-man directory and radicalism had been effectively thwarted. However, France was still at war with the rest of Europe and leadership began to pass into the hands of generals, which ultimately saw the emergence of Napoleon Bonaparte. France was not prepared for such social and political upheaval, and the resulting shift towards a republic would change the country forever. How to cite Radicalization French Revolution, Essay examples

The analysis of the text -May Day- by F. S. Fitzgerald free essay sample

The analysis of the text â€Å"May Day† by F. S. Fitzgerald. Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald (September 24, 1896- December 21, 1940) was an Irish American Jazz Age novelist and short story writer. Fitzgerald is regarded as one of the greatest American writers of the twentieth century. In his own age, Fitzgerald was the self-styled spokesman of the Lost Generation, or the Americans born in the 1890s who came of age during World War I. He finished four novels, left a fifth unfinished, and wrote dozens of short stories that treat themes of youth, despair, and age. Many admire what they consider his remarkable emotional honesty. His heroes- handsome, confident, and doomed blaze brilliantly before exploding, and his heroines are typically beautiful, intricate, and alluring. Fitzgerald started writing for periodicals, publishing early stories such as The Diamond as Big as The Ritz, later collected in Tales of The Jazz Age (1922). Fame and prosperity were both welcome and frightening; in The Beautiful and Damned (1922), he describes the life he and Zelda feared, a descent into ennui and dissipation. The Fitzgeralds moved in 1924 to the French Riviera, where they fell in with a group of American expatriates, described in his last completed novel, Tender Is The Night (1934). Shortly after their arrival, he completed his greatest work, The Great Gatsby (1925), which poignantly expresses his ambivalence about American life, at once vulgar and dazzlingly promising. Some of his finest short stories of this period, particularly The Rich Boy and Absolution, appeared in All the Sad Young Men (1926). His last work, the Hollywood novel The Last Tycoon (1941), was left unfinished at his death at 44 of alcohol-related causes. The text under analysis is an extract from the short story May Day. The text is about two friends, who are both twenty-four, Yale graduates of the year before the war. One of them is Philip Dean, a wealthy successful man, who is in his vacations in New York; the other friend is Gordon Sterrett, the straight opposition to his friend, an unsuccessful penniless man who is searching for a job in New York. In this extract Gordon Sterrett is begging Philip Dean to give him some money to make a fresh start. At the end they quite suddenly and definitely hated each other. The theme of the text is the conflict between rich and poor, . The introduction of the text is written in high-flown style. The setting is New York City at the end of the First World War (â€Å"There had been a war fought and won and the great city of the conquering people was crossed with triumphal arches and vivid with thrown flowers of white, red and rose†). The author shows pathos and triumph which is typical to chronicles and epic narrations with the help of different figures of speech, so he uses a lot of stylistic devises, such as epithets great and vivid city, triumphal arches, resonant wind of the brasses.  inversion: â€Å"There had been a war fought and won†¦Ã¢â‚¬ , â€Å"thrown flowers of white, red and rose†. The next part is narrated in the form of dialogue between two young friends. It is full of shortenings such as it’s, I’m, you’d, you’ll, I’ve, won’t, and , and vulgarisms: Every God damn thing†¦, I’ve made a hell of†¦.. The text is told in the 3rd person singular. Fitzgerald likes to include a lot of dialogue, not only to keep the readers attention, but also to elaborate on what was taking place throughout the story and give a more in-depth look into the lives of the characters in the story. The dialogues enabled the reader to feel as though you were a character in the story. Before a dialogue the narrator gives some background information indirectly to enable the reader to follow along with the interaction that is to take place between characters. Much of the detail he puts into the story act as a stage direction, similar to that of a play. The author introduced to a wide range of characters, though really there are only two types: the fortunate and the unlucky, the haves and have-nots. He represented them in a contrast. They are described indirectly through their actions, speech, thoughts, appearance. Fitzgerald could hardly make the distinction clearer than in the substantive opening chapter, which reacquaints old Yale graduates Gordon Sterrett (â€Å"his eyes †¦ framed below with the blue semicircle of ill health, heightened by an unnatural glow which coloured his face like a low, incessant fever†) and Philip Dean (â€Å"blond, ruddy and rugged †¦ Everything about him radiated fitness and bodily comfort†). Sterrett is down on his luck, and Dean finds that â€Å"there was something in his present misery that repelled him and hardened him, even though it excited his curiosity. By the end of the chapter, when Dean has loaned Sterrett five dollars, â€Å"they quite suddenly and definitely hated each other. † Firstly, the author depicted them in an opposition their appearance and clothing. They are described with the help of epithets: George Sterrett is a small, slender, darkly handsome man dressed in a shabby suit with ragged and linty shirt-cuff, faded and thumb-creased tie of former glory; while Philip Dean was blond, ruddy, and rugged under his thin pajamas. Everything about him radiated fitness and bodily comfort. He smiled frequently, showing large and prominent teeth., a family of thick silk shirts littered on the chairs amid impressive neckties and soft woollen socks. , dressed in blue silk pajamas, It was of very heavy silk, yellow, with a pale blue stripe and there were nearly a dozen of them, fresh underwear. The emotional state of main characters is rather different, too. It changes from enthusiastic, surprised and with a half-exuberance in the very beginning to anxious, depressive and with rising anger in the last paragraph: shook his head impatiently, . hated each other. Philip Dean is a self-affected person, also he is a former sportsman and the following details of his behavior â€Å"polishing the body, draping reluctantly, inspecting calves and knees, bestowing† depict it. Similarity â€Å"the sunshine which poured† expresses the excellent mood of the heroes. F. S. Fitzgerald vividly depicts his image by using â€Å"being unfairly saddled with responsibility† to distinguish Philip’s condition during the conversation. Thee author used the personification â€Å"eyes roved nervously around the room† and for his eyes â€Å"resting for a moment† shows how unconfident and shy Gordon was at the moment?when George was alone in the room. The metaphor â€Å"the morning sunshine poured into the room† is used to create a relaxing atmosphere to stress Philip’s confidence. The author implies the metaphor â€Å"I can draw like a streak† in order to prove his talent. Also one point is their voice, wh ich is changed, too. Firstly they spoke eagerly, gradually enthusiastic, moreover we can see some peculiarities of colloquial and literary speech â€Å"Weil, how was Gordy, old boy! † Im all in. , look all shot to lead the readers into the positive feelings of old friends. But during the conversation the situation changes so the voice becomes: miserable, shaking and trembling with a hesitant note and cold formalism, shook his head impatiently. Asyndeton Its an air of worry and poverty and sleepless nights was used in order to support the miserable emotional attitude of Gordon. In conclusion we can mention that Francis Scott Key Fitzgerald is considered a member of the Lost Generation, and key terms of Fitzgerald’s works Jazz Age, Lost Generation and American Dream. The main idea depicts it. This idea is the basis for such phenomenon in American culture as American dream.